Contrary to the ideals of open government? (updated)

Jan 22 update:
We have now received a reply from the Mayor to our email – he has not yet answered our question in the final paragraph.  However, he did point out that it was not Coun. Keating who voted ‘no’ on Jan 11th, the ‘no’ votes came from him and another member.


texts of emails: NVCV- Public input correspondence Jan 15


Original post:

Open letter addressed to Mayor and Council, City of North Vancouver
Copy to Editor, North Shore News


It appears the anti-democratic nature of a policy change made last June by North Vancouver City Council is finally rearing its ugly head. At the last two Council meetings, for the first time in our memory, Council voted to deny citizens the right to speak during the Public Input period.


In June 2015 the Mayor and his majority bloc on Council (Councillors Back, Buchanan, Keating) passed a bylaw stating that if more than five people signed up to speak for two minutes each at Public Input, it would require the unanimous consent of Council. Previously, extending the number past five just required a simple majority vote, and was generally treated as a mere formality. Everyone was welcome to speak.


At the Jan. 11 meeting, six people requested a chance to speak, but a No vote by Councillor Keating prevented the sixth from speaking. The following week, 15 people signed up, and this time the Mayor and his entire team voted against allowing more than the first five. At the end of the meeting Councillor Bookham asked the Mayor for clarification – why is the policy being strictly adhered to now? The Mayor’s response: “I won’t allow that type of question.”


Voices commented previously on the bylaw change (see, which we believe runs contrary to the ideals of open government and citizen engagement. None of our neighboring municipalities have such draconian restrictions; most welcome the input of their citizens.


Many of our neighbors have asked us whether this will be the policy going forward – only 5 speakers at Public Input from now on, no matter what – or will it depend on which names councillors see on the sign-up sheet? We would appreciate a response from the City that we can circulate to concerned residents of our community.


Fred Dawkins and Toni Bolton for

North Van City Voices


One response to “Contrary to the ideals of open government? (updated)

  1. northvancityvoices

    Dear Editor:
    I was shocked at Monday Jan 18th’s City Council meeting when Mayor Mussatto & his slate voted against hearing all of the 15 citizens who had arrived early & signed up to have their
    2 min Public Input. This from a Mayor who professes to value public input & who stated he would “govern from the middle”. Limiting the speakers to 5 saved City Council 20 minutes but cost us immeasurably in lost input & respect from & for our taxpayers. It is now abundantly clear that the City of North Vancouver is no longer a democracy which values the comment of its citizenry but rather a Mussato & slate’s dictatorship run amok.
    Can a useless bike lift be far behind?
    Councilor Rod Clark
    City of North Vancouver

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s