Quoting from Paul Sullivan’s article in the NS News today “Meanwhile, it looks like development as usual in the city, where they appear to be testing the boundaries of the word “density.”
Quotes from the new ‘slate’ – ranging from Mayor-elect Buchanan referring to growth ‘I’m comfortable with where we are and the density we’ve put in’ to two of the new Councillors ‘our City has the lowest population growth in the Province and no growth 2017/2018’ and ‘the City has followed the plans for growth … in the Metro Vancouver Regional Plan’ are concerning. Who have these people been listening to? Certainly not the average resident who is very aware that the City of North Van has already exceeded the 2041 Regional Growth Targets.
Quoting from the article ‘And it was a near thing in the city – Heywood lost to Buchanan by a mere 400 votes, and altogether, the slow growth faction received twice as many votes as Buchanan in the race for mayor. This leaves Don Bell as the foremost advocate for slowing things down in the city: “Too much density, too fast” he told the North Shore News. I have a feeling he ain’t seen nothin’ yet.’
We wish Councillor Bell all the best as the people’s advocate.
Article from the North Shore News: with a summary of the Candidate Meeting at Ridgeway School earlier this week:
Things need to slow down around here – and fast!
The expedient rate of growth in the City of North Vancouver was one of several key issues that 22 council hopefuls sounded off on during an all-candidates meeting hosted by the Grand Boulevard Residents Association Wednesday night.
“It’s been frustrating for the last four years to be part of too many 4-3 votes in which I was one of the three,” said incumbent Coun. Don Bell, addressing a packed-to-the-rafters gym at Ridgeway Elementary. “I was concerned about the rate of development. I don’t think we can or need to stop it, but we need to slow it down. We need to allow infrastructure to catch up.”
With regards to developers, the city shouldn’t “roll out the red carpet for them,” noted business owner Alborz Jaberolansar. “You make them earn their place in the City of North Vancouver.”
Citing the need to address the city’s myriad traffic and parking problems, business owner and former city councillor Bill Bell stated: “It’s time to slow things down. Increasing density is not the answer.”
A sizable number of council candidates talked about the need for more rental options in the city, including Mack McCorkindale, who encouraged more affordable housing projects so that people could continue to live and work in the community.
“You have to approve the projects that have affordable components to them,” he said. “Prioritize rental projects so that they’re at the front of the line. We don’t need more market condos, we need to build affordable rental housing.”
Jessica McIlroy, a renewable energy and sustainability consultant, noted that the “appropriate housing issue” was paramount in the city. “That means housing that our seniors can age in, housing that our working staff can stay in our community, housing that allows young people to move into their first homes.”
Almost all the candidates got involved when it came to talking about motor vehicles – whether it was bemoaning a lack of parking in the city or brainstorming how to get them moving swiftly through traffic again.
“We are in a sorry state of traffic, affordability and shrinking personal spaces,” said planning manager Shervin Shahriari.
“It’s just not a very good situation,” he said. “One of the ways I think we can do it is to make sure that there’s a one-to-one ratio between development, condominiums and parking.”
“The reason I vote against many of the developments that come before council is because they’re not providing ample parking,” added Coun. Don Bell.
Candidate Bob Fearnley suggested the city look into a free shuttle bus that traverses Lonsdale and other busy areas as a way to “reduce the need for us to always use a car. It would be a simple solution to parking.”
Seniors’ transportation advocate John McCann, when referring to an earlier moment in the meeting when candidates were discussing how to combat climate change, said he thought it was ironic that the conversation then turned to motor vehicles. “On one hand we were talking about greenhouse gas emissions, and we got to get the cars off the road, and now we want more parking spots,” he said. “It just doesn’t sit well with me.”
University student Mica Jensen said in order to solve the parking issue, the number of cars being used needed to be reduced. She offered the upcoming Main-Marine B-Line and other transit options as a possible remedy to this. “That could really work for our community,” she said.
Most candidates observed that the new $237-million Harry Jerome rec centre would be a benefit to the city, with some reservations.
“I’m very excited that Harry Jerome is finally going to get rebuilt. It’s been 15 years in the planning and we’ve done report after report after report,” said incumbent Coun. Holly Back. “The meeting spaces for all ages, from daycares to seniors, are going to be amazing.”
The new rec centre, which will replace the more than 50-year-old building, will include curling and skating rinks, two pools, the Silver Harbour Seniors’ Centre, a fitness centre, gym, as well as housing in the form of the nearby Harry Jerome neighbourhood lands that will include an 802-unit Upper Lonsdale development.
Immigration consultant Thomas Tofigh said he “totally and completely” supported the new rec centre, but said parts of it needed to go back to the drawing board since Flicka Gymnastics, a youth sports organization with more than 2,000 members, was left out of latest plans for the rebuild.
Business consultant Tina Hu said she wanted to bring her “financial expertise” to council in order to help with the new rec centre. “I think it’s going to be a great community centre for all to share,” she said. “I know it comes with a price tag and I know there’s a huge financial commitment.”
With regards to the rec centre, Joe Heilman said he thought it would be a “great thing for all of us,” but he bemoaned the number of residential units – which will include one 30-storey tower and one 26-storey tower in addition to three six-storey buildings and one five-storey – being built along with the project at 21st and 23rd streets along Lonsdale Avenue.
Candidate Angela Girard raised the issue of child care. “Our great city has attracted many young families to it, but now we’re faced with a lack of child care,” she said. “We need to build child care in new developments where families are living.”
Elsewhere throughout the meeting, environmental researcher Anna Boltenko talked about how there’s a discrepancy between the definition of affordable housing and what’s actually affordable; Ron Sostad talked about his desire for more social housing in the community; and Ron Polly talked about protecting city parkland and the environment.
Brett Thorburn said he felt that the city has a responsibility to create vibrant public spaces in order to attract people to nearby local small businesses; Tony Valente said the city must prioritize public transit and provide a variety of housing forms; and Antje Wilson, referring to the recently released Integrated North Shore Transportation Planning Project report, said she was in favour of making the city even more pedestrian friendly. “I want to continue to encourage people to walk and we can do this by building sustainable, complete communities so people don’t need to go off the Shore to get what they need,” she said.
If elected, candidate Max Zehedi talked about introducing a motion to ban all single-use plastics “as soon as possible.”
Candidates Pooneh Alizadeh and Aaron Lobo did not attend Wednesday’s all-candidates meeting.
He states, referring to Mayoral Candidates Buchanan and Clark: ‘Two anti NIMBY’s voicing similar sanctimonious robotic platforms that would enable either one IF elected to further deconstruct and devastate the social wellness and livability of our city… All you have to do discerning voters is look at their evidentiary pro density city council records over the last four years’.
We would strongly suggest that you DO look at their records – Councillor Clark, together with Councillors Bell and Bookham, has consistently voted against the majority slate, hence the references to the 4-3 vote approving most developments. The majority being Mussatto, Back, Buchanan and Keating.
DO NOT ACCEPT SOMEONE BLINDLY STATING FALSE FACTS!
Article borrowed from Business in Vancouver and quoting in part: For the past three years, housing has consistently topped the charts as the most important issue facing most cities in Metro Vancouver.
One of the issues that have played a role in the sudden loss of esteem for real estate developers is the perception of cosiness with sitting municipal administrations. This becomes clear when Metro Vancouverites are asked a simple question: who has more influence on the look and feel of your municipality?
Comment by Voices: This perception is very evident in the City of North Vancouver, with the development community funding the election of the consistent 4-3 majority on Council. A good question for Mayoral candidate Buchanan – why have you not supported the Regional Growth Strategy Targets for the City of North Vancouver? currently exceeding the year 2041?
Across the Lower Mainland, only 24% of residents believe their municipal government is the deciding authority when it comes to the future of neighbourhoods. A slightly smaller proportion (22%) believe the community itself has more influence.
Who is regarded as the most powerful voice when it comes to how our neighbourhoods look and feel? Developers, as stated by two in five Metro Vancouverites (39%). Men (44%) are more likely to express this opinion than women (34%), but all generations agree that governments and communities are taking a back seat in these discussions.
The public is also particularly critical of the idea that, in an effort to build, the character of their municipality is being abandoned. Three in four Metro Vancouverites (74%) feel that developers are too quick to demolish and rebuild when existing facades and structures could be kept.
The results outline two problems for incoming city councils. One is the perceived lack of consultation from members of specific communities, who may find it difficult to attend meetings or have a voice in traditional forums. The other is the feeling of powerlessness when the relationship between developers and municipal politicians is as entrenched as it is in some cities.
North Van City Voices has documented that the City of North Van has exceeded the 2041 Regional Growth Targets and is rushing to get through more density before the vote on October 20th: partial quote from the article:
The shift from the Livable Region Strategic Plan in 1996 to the 2011 Regional Growth Strategy has directed the emphasis to growth objectives. As land values have increased due to speculative inflation from rezoning for more density, demolitions of older, more affordable buildings have increased, with more people displaced, causing skyrocketing homelessness and unaffordability. Most of the new supply is unaffordable for both owners and renters and often left empty.
Now the enormous costs of servicing this growth agenda are emerging with the need for billions of dollars to upgrade utility services.
The city’s consultants confirmed as far back as 2014 that there is more than enough existing zoned capacity to meet population growth beyond 2041. Yet the city continues a manic rush to rezone.
The City of Vancouver is on a mad rush job to rezone Kitsilano and Cedar Cottage in a move that will only benefit developers.
Comment from Voices: this letter to the editor from a Councillor in Gibsons was published in The Coast Reporter, his comments in part apply equally to the City of North Vancouver.
‘Our “us versus them” mentality is too simplistic; we are fully capable of making collective decisions based on reason and evidence, instead of individualistic partisanship and ideology.’ and ‘We need to go about the business of the community with common courtesy, civility and dialogue, and greet the darker sides of human nature with humility, respect and compassion. This community deserves nothing less.’
Comment from Voices: We have made this statement previously to Council about our concern that our excess development (exceeding 2041 regional growth targets in 2017) has not and will not result in ‘more affordable housing’. Elizabeth Murphy concurs with us in this article. As we have stated below, and we note that the reference to Council* is to the votes cast consistently by the 4-3 block: Mussatto, Back, Buchanan and Keating.
The building boom continues unabated. There seems to be no limit to this Council’s love of high-density high-rise residential development. As we have documented before, the pace of growth in North Van is already far beyond our commitment under the Regional Growth Strategy. Yet Council * routinely overrides the limits of our Official Community Plan, using density bonuses and transfers to allow ever larger and taller developments.
Quoting from the article in the Vancouver Sun:
The first job of the next city council should be to revisit all the growth plans and reconsider if this is in the public interest. With all the excess zoning capacity the city already has in the system, there is time to plan this more carefully. The problem is that most of the new construction is unaffordable and involves demolishing the older building stock that former occupants could afford but who are then displaced. More new supply is not making things more affordable — quite the opposite. Vancouver is in an affordability crisis of its own making that requires a rethink of current growth with consideration of all the costs and impacts. Read more:
Further to this earlier post, we have received the following breakdown from a City resident, with this comment:
‘Two things come immediately to mind. Look at the potential savings from a merger of the NV City and District. Also, look at how well compensated the CNV mayor is relative to other communities with much bigger problems – like Surrey for example.’
Langley, District Municipality
North Vancouver, District Municipality
North Vancouver, City of
Langley, City of
We ‘borrowed’ this Chart of the Week from Metro Matters (contact email@example.com), a CBC Vancouver newsletter:
The base salaries above do not include expenses, additional allowances for being ‘Mayor of the month’ $1350/ month served, Metro Vancouver payments etc.