NEW: Posted February 24th:
Council Agenda for Feb 27th (in brief):
Delegation re $10 a day child care; Committee report Corporate Climate Action Plan; Sunrise Parkland Adjustment (Keith and Brooksbank); LEC Building Reviews and Application Fee Adjustment
detail here: http://www.cnv.org/Your-Government/Council-Meetings
WALKING: The City requests your input to a new initiative and survey: from the CNV website: http://www.cnv.org/city-services/streets-and-transportation/walking
To launch Walk CNV, we are inviting residents to share why walking is important to you and what would encourage you to walk more often.
Only TWO Council Meetings in January – Jan 9th and 16th
The meeting previously scheduled for the 23rd has been cancelled. Each meeting lasted less than 45 minutes – on Jan 9 there were 18 staff present and on Jan 16th there were 28 staff members plus Council members. No business to discuss publicly?
Recap of where we are after 2 years of city business dominated by the Mayor’s slate:
The building boom continues unabated. There seems to be no limit to this Council’s love of high-density high-rise residential development. As we have documented before, the pace of growth in North Van is already far beyond our commitment under the Regional Growth Strategy. Yet Council routinely overrides the limits of our Official Community Plan, using density bonuses and transfers to allow ever larger and taller developments.
The casino is back. Opposed by most residents and rejected by the independent majority on the previous council, a casino is back on the table. Residents aren’t asking for it, it’s not a needed community amenity, and many concerns have been raised about negative social impacts – but none of that seems to matter to the Slate compared with the expected financial windfall, much of which will come from the pockets of problem gamblers.
Public input has been curtailed. We have appealed to Council more than once on this issue, and been ignored. The right of citizens to speak at Council meetings has been severely curtailed by restrictive new rules.
Livability? What’s that? This Council’s preoccupation with cramming more and more people into our little enclave has not been accompanied by much care for its livability. Traffic gets worse and worse with no sign of relief – not only is there no concrete plan for improved transit, the City has failed to prevent the loss of North Vancouver’s only bus depot. The much-needed rebuild of Harry Jerome recreation centre languishes near the bottom of the priority list.
We know that a great many North Van residents are concerned about these issues. Our humble website has had more than 11,000 views since January. We constantly hear from residents who are frustrated by the sense that the game is rigged and they are not being heard. All we can say is – keep yourself informed. Keep coming out to the public meetings and making your voice heard. Write letters to the NS News, and talk to your neighbours about the issues. Even if the Slate won’t listen, maybe the voting public will.
*we continue to track new applications and will respond to queries.
Posted May 30: Graham Harrop editorial cartoon, VancouverSun
Posted Jan 29:
Reminder from Voices: If you wish to speak at public input, be sure to arrive about 5.30 when the list first comes out – more than five speakers no guarantee you will speak, negotiation skills needed with others wanting to speak.
Also, evidence from last week’s meeting that the new regulation to speak once every three months on an item will be upheld.
Posted Jan 28:
This is the link on the City’s website to the package of Closed reports that Council authorized the release of at its meeting of January 25, 2016:
We note that the report is 668 pages without an index provided, and contains documents from 2012. We also note that the comparisons provided in the BDO report were Storyeum, the Vancouver Museum and the Squamish Railway Museum.
Welcome to our updated website. This “NEWS” page will have announcements of upcoming meetings, public hearings and other information we feel should be highlighted.
The “COUNCIL” tab will focus on gathered facts – expenses, salaries etc. We’ll have a section for “Questions We Couldn’t Ask” (concerns arising from meetings), and “Did They Really Say That”? (Shake your head moments).
The “ARTICLES” tab will have relevant published information from other sources.
The “SUBMISSIONS’ tab will list our submissions to Council at Council Meetings in Public Hearings or the Public Input portion.
The “STATISTICS” tab will summarize the Regional Growth Strategy to 2041 and where we are to date with planned projects.
The “ABOUT” tab has our contact information and history.
We recognize that our city (North Vancouver) is growing and will continue to grow. Growth is healthy. However, there is a big difference between managed, prudent growth and unfettered developer driven growth. We believe we are getting too much of the latter. The current Mayor and Council are in a rush to rapidly increase the population density by allowing developers to build beyond the limits of our Official Community Plan (a process called density bonusing). This is resulting in land speculation, a glut of oversized condo towers, growing traffic problems, and increasingly inadequate recreational and other community amenities. We’re trying to hold the current mayor and his Council majority accountable by doing research, speaking up at public meetings, and informing the public in any way we can. We note that this mayor and three councillors all receive significant campaign funding from the same developers who then come before Council applying for density bonuses and upzoning. Such a clear conflict of interest is illegal at all other levels of government, but somehow permissible at the municipal level.
This term will be interesting, with major projects to come before Council. In part, the OCP is complete but without a density bonus policy, Harry Jerome, Lot 5, Site 8, the Museum, the Polygon Gallery, Harbourside, Gaming, School lands and needed infrastructure and transit improvements. There is no evidence yet of the new majority voting independently. We would remind those Councillors that they do not have a majority of voters behind them.