Monthly Archives: February 2015

Excessive Industry Influence?

Voices comment:  This is borrowed from a posting on the CityHallWatch site, and discusses the Marine Gardens rezoning.  The process here is similar to the development application process in the City of North Van which seemingly often begins with a chat about ‘how big can we go?’  Does the City of North Van have limits on density bonuses, density transfers?  The answer would seem to be ‘NO’.  Did developers fund the majority on Council?   That answer is definitely ‘YES’.  OCP Public Hearing March 3rd 6pm.

 

Vancouver_rezoning_system_chw_v2

So this is how the system works.

Our entire civic system in Vancouver operates in the context of strong and often invisible connections between players and the underlying power of money and profits. Givers at one stage become the receivers at the next. It is like a self-reinforcing power structure.

In that context, what hope is there for neighbourhoods and citizens? Read below, and ask how deeply entrenched these patterns are in Vancouver. How long have things been this way? How many rezonings in the past ten years have been like this.

Read full article here: https://cityhallwatch.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/support-letters-connections-marine-gardens/

.

UBC professor Patrick Condon says high-rise buildings are not the way to go in Vancouver – The Ubyssey

Voices comment:  This was published in The Ubyssey in October 2014, and with the current emphasis on sustainability and the upcoming OCP public hearing we thought it was worth a read.  Patrick Condon, the author, worked with the City of North Vancouver on ‘the 100 year Sustainability Vision’ a few years ago.  

Quoting in part:

The City of Vancouver has recently drawn community criticism over high-rise development projects beyond the downtown core. Condon, who is a vocal proponent of low-rise neighbourhoods, recommends a “cheaper and better structurally sound” approach to city planning rather than building typical skyscrapers in a city that requires earthquake resistant domiciles.

“Where you’re going to build, build four to five storeys,” said Condon, who also advocates an increase in trees to maintain the city’s charms.

Link:

UBC professor Patrick Condon says high-rise buildings are not the way to go in Vancouver – The Ubyssey.

.

See Who Paid for the 2014 Elections

Voices comment:  The big question remains ‘who is expecting what’?????  We note the largest expense for the Mayor was salaries at over $33,000; Kerry Morris’ run was supported entirely by volunteers from the community.

 

From the North Shore News today:

Editorial:  Chequered Past

The province has dragged its feet long enough on bringing in some reasonable limits on municipal campaign donations and spending.

In civic election campaign finance documents made public this week we’ve seen record spending for council seats and chains of office in both our own community and others around the province. We won’t argue that accepting a donation from a person or business automatically amounts to a conflict of interest.

And a bigger campaign budget doesn’t always buy you a win. Ask some of the also-rans who put up a small fortune of their own money about that.

But the perception is bad and for many, perception is reality. Runaway spending and lavish donations in civic election campaigns sully the discourse at the council table and erodes public faith in the system.

Toronto outlaws business and union donations for municipal candidates. Quebec and Manitoba cap spending in city elections based on the size of the population. We would welcome a combination of either. Local government should not be a hobby for the independently wealthy or a business expense for developers.

Of course, any new rules should come with watchdog power that provides Elections B.C. teeth to enforce them and to investigate complaints. Ultimately, we feel a community is best served by a council that reflects a diversity of ideas, values, expertise and backgrounds – and the best way to get that is to level the playing field. It’s time the wild west of B.C.’s civic elections got a lot less wild.

– See more at: http://www.nsnews.com/chequered-past-1.1776831#sthash.s5IAYdVM.dpuf

Article:

Campaign spending by City of North Vancouver candidates in the 2014 municipal election demolished old records.

Mayor Darrell Mussatto spent $74,051 in securing his fourth term, according to campaign finance disclosure documents released this week, while his main challenger Kerry Morris, spent even more, at $79,226.

The main difference, however, is where the money came from. Mussatto was up front during the campaign that he would be seeking financial support from developers, businesses and unions, which together made up the vast majority of the $91,394.79 he raised.

Morris campaigned on refusing donations from developers or businesses outside the city and limited personal donations to $300, so $70,911.52 came from his own pocket.

Among the developers contributing to the mayor’s campaign were Polygon Homes, Staburn Lower Lonsdale, Westbank Projects,

Anthem Properties, Marcon Developments, Hollyburn Properties, all of which donated either $1,000 or $2,000. Bigger donations of $5,000 came from Pinnacle International and RPMG Holdings, the parent company of Onni. Darwin Construction put up $5,125 in two separate donations.

Concert Properties’ president Brian McCauley made a personal donation of $2,000 and $3,000 came from Michael Gooding who is connected to FDG Property Management.

The single largest donation was $11,053.91 from KT Properties Ltd., whose president Tom Nellis is also a director of Playtime Community Gaming, a bingo and slot machine hall owner.

Outside the development industry, several of the North Shore’s major employers supported Mussatto’s campaign including Neptune Terminals ($2,000) and Seaspan ($2,000) as well as private school Bodwell Canada ($1,000), Sunshine Cabs ($1,000), Lower Lonsdale pub Sailor Hagars ($1,000) and Lonsdale Quay Market ($1,500). For union support, Mussatto drew on the Canadian Union of Public Employees local 389, which employs city workers, for $1,950, the Canadian Labour Congress ($5,000) and CUPE BC ($3,000).

Most of the money ($33,2984) was spent on salaries and wages, the rest going to Internet and print ads, brochures, rent for his campaign office, billboards and election signs and postage. Mussatto also had shared expenses with the candidates he was endorsing including Couns. Linda Buchanan, Holly Back and Craig Keating, plus contenders Kathy McGrenera, Matt Clark and Iani Makris.

Keating’s total expenses came to $24,197, Buchanan’s – $27,848 and Back’s – $11,251, drawing on many of the same donors as Mussatto, albeit in smaller amounts.

Rounding out the city council table, Coun. Rod Clark spent $2,361, about half of which was out of pocket. Coun. Pam Bookham spent $3,450 mostly self-funded and from individual donations, and Coun. Don Bell spent $11,570, most of which came from family and friends and a handful of businesses.

Mussatto said he stands by the legality and the ethics of his campaign fundraising and that development is key to his goal of creating sustainable neighbourhoods.

“They’re buying into my vision,” he said. “I have a very clear vision. I think I’ve been very consistent in my 21-plus years on city council. I have not wavered. I’ve been very clear that we have to combat climate change. We have to build a more sustainable city and I think we’re doing a very good job of that,” he said.

The average cost of a winning campaign in the District of North Vancouver

was just under $11,000 with Jim Hanson leading the way at $27,726 and Lisa Muri (who topped the polls) at the low end, spending only $1,013.

Though every West Vancouver incumbent who ran won re-election, the council seats still came with a cost. Coun. Mary-Ann Booth topped the list at $22,374, almost half of which came from real estate lawyer John Sampson. Couns. Michael Lewis, Craig Cameron and Christine Cassidy all spent between $10,000 and $16,000 with a mix of self-funding, individual

and business donors. Coun. Nora Gambioli spent $4,321 and Coun. Bill Soprovich, a habitually frugal campaigner, spent $1,991, half of which came from his realtor son Jason. For the second election in a row, Mayor Michael Smith ran unopposed and spent nothing to do so.

Under election laws, any money left over from a campaign is held in trust from the municipality and can be accessed by the candidate again for his or her next run in that jurisdiction. If the person opts not to run again, the money goes into the city’s general revenue.

 

– See more at: http://www.nsnews.com/news/see-who-paid-for-the-2014-elections-1.1776829#sthash.jC764lwj.dpuf

 

Muddled Planning and Fixation on Growth

Copy of  a letter to the North Shore News, re the planned changes to Eastern Avenue and 15th St. (reprinted with permission)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

RE: PLANNED CHANGE TO OCP FOR A NEW HI­RISE ON EASTERN AVENUE/15TH ST.

.

ANY change in the OCP for taller buildings on Eastern Avenue must take into consideration that Loblaw’s trucks are obliged by the city to use 15th St. in order to enter the lane to serve Loblaws and then return via Eastern Ave. This is mandated by the city.

.

Drivers return to Lonsdale via Eastern and 15th!

.

15th St is a congested thoroughfare with buses, ambulances, fire trucks, police etc. 15th is an already existing problem. It became more so with the new high rise on 15th west of Lonsdale too. A new building will bring more service vehicles and visitors. This intersection is already a major risk to cars and pedestrians.

.

15th St. is a major artery to get to St. Georges and Grand Boulevard in order to access streets to Lynn Valley and to the routes south and West off of Grand boulevard, which includes getting to Highway #1 via St. Georges or Grand Boulevard.

.

In addition parked cars block the sight lines at the crossing of 15th and 17th, which means that to enter either street one has to creep out to see the traffic.These are also very busy pedestrian crosswalks. Also to be taken into account are the bicycles on these streets as well as the infirm and aged using mechanical aids, walkers and canes to traverse the area to reach the hospital and other health facilities.

.

There is also dangerous jaywalking across 15th.

.

The intersection at 15th and Lonsdale is perilous. Cars turning from Lonsdale into 15th are breaking through the crosswalk with pedestrians already in the crosswalk, or from 15th encroach onto the crosswalk in order to enter Lonsdale or turn onto 15th.

.

To build a huge building of 12 stories on that site shows the lack of understanding of the day­to­day effect on ordinary people who will be affected by the muddled planning inspired by the fixation on growth and misguided urbanism.

.

The Council and Planning must show that the previous OCP is wrong and why it is wrong for this site now.

Jerry Zaslove

North Vancouver

 

Lies, Lies and Dam Lies

Borrowed from North Vancouver City News, written by Dorothy Bell:

Lies, Lies and Dam Lies

Forensic Accounting Just BeginningDarrel's ad

by Dorothy Bell

Georgia Straight October 1 2014

Mussatto dismissed the characterization that he is developer-friendly. “It’s ludicrous,” Mussatto said by phone. The mayor added that, as an independent, he’s not endorsing anyone in the election. “I’m running on my record, which is clear and transparent,” Mussatto said. “What you have seen from me, being honest and open and caring for everyone, will continue. And I think people who know me admire me.”

Oh the irony of it all. While Mussatto claims his independence, he also – as expected – endorsed a full slate of candidates in the last election. He lied. It was obvious from the start that his comments to the Straight were anything but ”being honest and open and caring.”

And now we get to see how much he was honest about….

The forensic auditing has just begun with the election disclosure forms being published this week by Elections BC. The forms list all the donations and expenses by all the candidates for North Vancouver City municipal elections. There are no surprises to political pundits except that the amount of donations far exceeds even the most cynical.

Team Mussatto spent a grand total of $173,591.95 with the vast majority of donations coming from developers. Those same developers are now lining up to put their projects before council to squeeze just that much more density from a council that just can’t say no. Don Bell, Pam Bookham and Rod Clark are the only 3 councilors with backbone and fortitude to run on their own dime and be willing to represent you and not just the developers that line their pockets at election time.

Stay tuned as we unravel the ribbons, uncover the truths and expose the deceit.

A Chat with Mayor Darrell Mussatto – part 2

Second installment of the interview by LowerLonsdale.ca of the Mayor together with Communications Manager  Connie Rabold is here:

http://lowerlonsdale.ca/articles/a-chat-with-nv-city-mayor-darrell-mussatto-part-2/

 

We (Voices) note that the Mayor seems to be math challenged, when the bike escalator was first floated around in Council, the cost per mile was estimated to be in excess of $4 million dollars.

This paragraph:

‘People automatically associate population and density growth with traffic and chaos, but the opposite can be true. When cities are built smarter, transit is more accessible and neighbourhoods are designed to be walkable, even though population is increasing, what happens is that families find they don’t need two cars. They walk to the grocery store and daycare because everything is closer together. Over the next ten years we’re going to make North Vancouver one of the most sustainable, walkable and cyclist-friendly cities in the world’.

came from a question about the 800 condo development in Seylynn, perhaps the Mayor has forgotten about the 800 unit development at Harbourside.  Where there is no grocery store within walking distance, no bus service, nothing is close.  Not even walkable for mobility challenged residents to get to Marine Drive.  This is not a ‘smart’ neighbourhood in any way. 

Still so many questions.

.

A spotlight on “public” support vs opposition for rezonings: Case study of Marine Gardens – Agents of Concord Pacific (proponent) dominate letters

For those North Van residents who were present at CNV public hearings for Onni or Harbourside, this will be very familiar.

CityHallWatch: Tools to engage in Vancouver city decisions

Towers proposed at Marine Gardens, policy report, 4-Feb-2015 Marine Gardens rezoning for 27 and 21 storey towers. Public Hearing Feb 24, 2015. Most letters of support so far come from the proponent’s own agents.

More public awareness and scrutiny is often needed to understand who is supporting a rezoning at a public hearing. How often do the people who make written or oral submissions to City Council in support a rezoning have undeclared direct or indirect pecuniary interests in a project being approved? Quite often, perhaps.

As one current example, it has been brought to our attention that persons with a direct connection with Concord Pacific comprise the majority of the people who wrote City Council so far in support (see PDF) of the Marine Gardens (455 Southwest Marine Drive) rezoning Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 24. Eleven of the 20 support letters are from employees working for Prompton Real Estate Services (www.prompton.com), which is an agent for…

View original post 868 more words

Local Election Spending CNV Nov 2014

Elections BC releases 2014 campaign spending disclosure forms for 2014 civic election.

Elected                                                              Expenses                         Contributions

Holly Back                                                         $12,246                             $11,251

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100122814.pdf

Don Bell                                                             $11,570                                $6565

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100123833.pdf

Pam Bookham                                                   $ 3,450                                $2090

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100122634.pdf

Linda Buchanan                                              $24,936                               $27,831

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100122857.pdf

Rod Clark                                                         $2,361                                   $ 1,730

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100120269.pdf

Craig Keating                                                  $24,197                                $26,988

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100123179.pdf

Darrell Mussatto                                            $74,051                                $91,394

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/lepublished/100122589.pdf

 

List of all candidates available here:

http://contributions.electionsbc.gov.bc.ca/pcs/LESearchResults.aspx?PFN=&E=(ALL)&FTK=0&FT=(ALL)&FN=(ALL)&OK=0&O=(ALL)&JTK=0&JT=(ALL)&JK=94&J=North+Vancouver%2c+City+of&EV=(ALL)

.

 

 

 

 

The City’s Official Community Plan – Is Resistance Futile?

Borrowed from North Van City News, written by former City Councillor Bob Fearnley and quoting in part ‘we have only begun to fight’:

link:  The City’s Official Community Plan – North Van City News.

 

by Bob Fearnley

North Vancouver City Council is planning to bring the draft Official Community Plan to a new Public Hearing on March 3rd.
Readers will remember that a draft OCP has been before Council before and was defeated. That was before the municipal election. Now that Councillor Keating and his partner in crime Mayor Mussatto have a solid four votes at Council, the draft OCP is back, with even more density than ever.

.
Opponents are already saying that if you found driving difficult before, or God forbid, you are hoping to find a parking space, you can forget about it. Some community residents are complaining that this draft OCP is an outright assault on our single family neighbourhoods. Still other residents question whether City Council has any intention of following the new draft Official Community Plan. After all, Councillor Keating has made abundantly clear our OCP is only a ‘notional’ document.

.

Is that all the Official Community Plan is, a notional document?

.

Now for those of you who wonder what the word notional means, it is defined as “existing only in theory or as a suggestion or idea” and this description of the OCP comes directly from the mouth of Councillor Keating. That is hardly a fitting description for our most important planning document, the master plan for the evolution of our community.

.

So why would anyone waste their time and effort in opposing a document that we already know our City Council has no intention of following?

.

Fair enough, but I for one, believe that all right minded citizens in our City should be outraged by the statements of Councillor Keating and Mayor Mussatto. Maybe it is true that the Keating/Mussatto team has the four votes required to push through the draft OCP. Hasn’t Councillor Keating has already told us that he plans to ignore the wishes of the public and will vote for the draft OCP, no matter what people tell him at the Public Hearing.

.

Yes, resistance may indeed seem futile but I for one, plan to make passing this noxious draft planning document an uncomfortable an experience for the Keating/ Mussatto team.

.

Yes, it may be another four years until the next election, but I have a long memory and so do many others in our community. If you care about our City then join with me on March 3rd at our Council Chambers. Let’s give City Council an earful on the pitfalls of being so arrogant as to ignore the voice of the people. We have only begun to fight.

.
Resistance is not futile, the process just requires some patience.

.

.

Last Post, Last Word

Following is retired City of North Van’s Councillor Guy Heywood’s last post from his blog.
Full post link is available here: http://www.guyheywood.ca/

Quoting in part:

Last Post, Last Word
20/2/2015 

This is my last post on my correspondence with Mr. Tollstam on the subjects of policing costs, secrecy, the public interest and bureaucracy etc.

It is also my last post on this blog since, like many of us who live in North Vancouver, there comes a time to just move on. I don’t like conflict and negativity. This correspondence and the blog has gone as far as it needs to.

If any of what I have talked about over the last couple of years has made sense, there is a pretty clear direction as to the work that needs to be done to make local government in North Vancouver as good as the quality of life and the people who live here. There are enough people with the time and resources to do it without my involvement for awhile.

Furthermore, that project will be a very positive one. A big part of it will entail thinking about what we as a North Vancouver community could do with all the time and money that is currently trapped in our duplicated governments and the needless dysfunction that comes from their natural pursuit of their own interests.

I know that some people would like to make reducing taxes the first priority and I am very certain that the risk of seeing them increase at the rate that they have in the past will be materially reduced.

However, our taxes are not (yet) that far out of synch with the rest of the region. My main issue is with the way they are spent.

I think the first tangible monetary benefit could be the construction of a new Harry Jerome community recreation centre, sitting as it does in the middle of North Vancouver and used pretty much 50/50 by City and District residents. The magnitude of the savings that could be gleaned from a gentle merging of the two bureaucracies would easily pay for that over a 25+ year amortization period with no new taxes!

Even more exciting is the savings in terms of time and energy currently spent on all the ‘work arounds’, joint reviews, negotiating and coordinating that has to be done to offset the natural competition between two bureaucracies and deliver services in spite of the City/District divide.

Those savings could be spent developing a true ‘North Vancouver’ brand. One that inspired and reinforced our sense of the wonderful place that is North Vancouver. A ‘true North Vancouver’ brand would look nothing like the District’s never-ending quest for “Identity” (the title of it’s Official Community Plan). Nor would it resemble the City’s resolute effort to shape community inside its awkward boundary with self promotional programs like the recently unveiled “CNV4ME”.

Instead of CNV4ME, I would rather talk about “North Vancouver for all of us!”

I feel better all ready….

Best regards,

Guy

ps. I will leave this up only a few days. What follows is my response to Ken’s second letter. It may read as a bit harsh but I believe the points are valid. I also think this is really an issue of structure rather than personalities. It is understandable that a 35+ year employee of a bureaucracy is going to defend it perhaps beyond being reasonable, but he should use information that is correct and not misleading in his arguments.